YouTube:
I think this YouTube rendering of the original sucks, big time. They might have selled their company for 10 billion, I do'nt care.
I just play by the facts. All I see is small, even tiny companies doing a much much better job at treating the uploaded original in a proper way like Revver and voila Sharkle:
nice quality, but needs some plug-ins...
and...
Google:
| walking my The Hague streets, filming myself | |
Quite good... makes you wonder what the new YouTube-Google combo might be able to offer, qualitywise...
![The Walk [2]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_ujpITwl6l5mF_B3Di1MqTlsuhTR3yscNq8-J0glX8F82doNzmTre8w8tgvO3Wjt2ragHC9ZPNlNg0Uk-tHLqyRFvAiW5ekooGjoyN2o5LayvD5ZoGA4UC7-a7xK167_6aRHAqb_dlkxnSndEWR9I6dm-iBLvshV0vnkYG20ZTmbqXigYeSiDpVM-NmN2ar3wlktpHM7mCtNma0aMj_At8VR8kuJnGeZfPNd29JVd4=s0-d)
The Walk [2]
Please compare the different uploads from the same original
This is the sequel to The Walk [+ 27,000 views]
which can be viewed here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rgS_p7hIFI
Maurits! Thank You for exhaustive comparision ... I just trying motionBox (there are not interactions beetween participants) and starting with soapBox (poor quality, in my opinion)
ReplyDeleteThe Hague must be wonderfull city! Have a nice walk:-)
MotionBox quality is about the same as Revver and Sharkle, and better then YouTube.
ReplyDeleteand as you say there is no community feedback whatsoever, even on Google Video where commenting is an option.
Repository is more the thing then cyberspacing it seems nowadays